This is a thought-provoking article. I agree with your observations on the cynical divide-and-rule tactics being deployed. Your quantitative analysis misses a couple of important points, though:
First, these grooming gang crimes were not just committed by individuals or small cliques of scoundrels. This systematic and routine grooming and abuse of White, Christian girls occurred in plain view of the perpetrators' families and communities. The rapists were so assured of their community's complicity that they just called all their mates, cousins, brothers, uncles etc. to get a piece of the action. I don't know about you, but if I had a little girl tied up in my bedroom and called my friends and family to help me rape her, I would have the police kicking in my door. I have not heard of a single case where somebody in the Pakistani/Muslim community (other than a single social services employee) picked up a phone to save the girls. Thus, these crimes are owned by at least large sections of entire Pakistani communities in a number of British towns. This is collective guilt as the sum of individuals' sins of omission or commission. Your low-percentage figures of actual perpetrators are therefore highly misleading.
Second, if gangs of White/Christian men had been grooming and raping brown/Muslim girls over decades, with the backing of their local W/C communities, and whilst being shielded by the authorities and media, I think that most decent W/C, including your subscribers, would have publicly expressed outrage at these crimes committed by members of our community. There would be demonstrations by us to demand the harshest punishment for the perpetrators. Our desire for justice would override our (non-existing) tribalism. Not so with the Muslim/Pakistani communities. I do not recall having seen Muslim/Pakistani communities having condemn their own in public and in the strongest tones. Tribalism triumphs. Instead, their spokespeople present their communities as the victims of 'racism', 'bigotry' and whatever.
I didn't think we needed yet another article on the workings of Pakinstani grooming gangs, when social and MSM is already flooded with only that topic. Definitely there is Pakistani community complicity (see Doc Malik - Raja Miah), but the point was to show the myopic focus on only that subcategory is somebody's editorial decision - which ignores the bigger picture and inflames racial tensions which were created largely through years of multicultural censorship of majority (also artificial).
Thanks Alex great piece highlighting this topic and clarifying its emotional distraction, how the subject has been framed and thus the more real issues such as the bite of austerity, pouring taxpayer money and resources into proxy wars and the avoidance of the overarching dilemmas - why aren't the super rich being taxed and why is Britain a failing state - are never discussed by those in power
This is a thought-provoking article. I agree with your observations on the cynical divide-and-rule tactics being deployed. Your quantitative analysis misses a couple of important points, though:
First, these grooming gang crimes were not just committed by individuals or small cliques of scoundrels. This systematic and routine grooming and abuse of White, Christian girls occurred in plain view of the perpetrators' families and communities. The rapists were so assured of their community's complicity that they just called all their mates, cousins, brothers, uncles etc. to get a piece of the action. I don't know about you, but if I had a little girl tied up in my bedroom and called my friends and family to help me rape her, I would have the police kicking in my door. I have not heard of a single case where somebody in the Pakistani/Muslim community (other than a single social services employee) picked up a phone to save the girls. Thus, these crimes are owned by at least large sections of entire Pakistani communities in a number of British towns. This is collective guilt as the sum of individuals' sins of omission or commission. Your low-percentage figures of actual perpetrators are therefore highly misleading.
Second, if gangs of White/Christian men had been grooming and raping brown/Muslim girls over decades, with the backing of their local W/C communities, and whilst being shielded by the authorities and media, I think that most decent W/C, including your subscribers, would have publicly expressed outrage at these crimes committed by members of our community. There would be demonstrations by us to demand the harshest punishment for the perpetrators. Our desire for justice would override our (non-existing) tribalism. Not so with the Muslim/Pakistani communities. I do not recall having seen Muslim/Pakistani communities having condemn their own in public and in the strongest tones. Tribalism triumphs. Instead, their spokespeople present their communities as the victims of 'racism', 'bigotry' and whatever.
I didn't think we needed yet another article on the workings of Pakinstani grooming gangs, when social and MSM is already flooded with only that topic. Definitely there is Pakistani community complicity (see Doc Malik - Raja Miah), but the point was to show the myopic focus on only that subcategory is somebody's editorial decision - which ignores the bigger picture and inflames racial tensions which were created largely through years of multicultural censorship of majority (also artificial).
Thanks Alex great piece highlighting this topic and clarifying its emotional distraction, how the subject has been framed and thus the more real issues such as the bite of austerity, pouring taxpayer money and resources into proxy wars and the avoidance of the overarching dilemmas - why aren't the super rich being taxed and why is Britain a failing state - are never discussed by those in power